<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Barb's Connected World &#187; DRM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitalmediaphile.com/index.php/tag/drm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitalmediaphile.com</link>
	<description>Zero Degrees of Separation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 13:29:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>MS to force us to view ads whether we want to or not??</title>
		<link>http://digitalmediaphile.com/index.php/2007/12/22/ms-to-force-us-to-view-ads-whether-we-want-to-or-not/</link>
		<comments>http://digitalmediaphile.com/index.php/2007/12/22/ms-to-force-us-to-view-ads-whether-we-want-to-or-not/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 23:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Barb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Annoyances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DRM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalmediaphile.com/2007/12/22/MS+To+Force+Us+To+View+Ads+Whether+We+Want+To+Or+Not.aspx</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ZDnet blogger Russell Shaw certainly has found a scary patent filed by Microsoft. &#8220;Enforcing rendering advertisements and other predetermined media content in connection with playback of downloaded selected media content. Playback of selected media content is made conditional on acquisition of a playback token that is generated in response to playback of the predetermined content. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ZDnet blogger Russell Shaw certainly has found a <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/ip-telephony/?p=2916" target="_blank">scary patent</a> filed by Microsoft.</p>
<p>&#8220;<em>Enforcing rendering advertisements and other predetermined media content in connection with playback of downloaded selected media content. Playback of selected media content is made conditional on acquisition of a playback token that is generated in response to playback of the predetermined content. </em></p>
<p><em>The playback token may be implemented as a digital rights management (DRM) license acquired in response to playback of the predetermined content. Another aspect involves a content insertion engine for inserting ads or other predetermined content into the playback of downloaded content</em>.&#8221;</p>
<p>DRM gets more Draconian with every passing day. Since the ad supported model obviously works so poorly, will we be forced into a Big Brother is watching you watch ads universe? Is the next step a patent to embed subliminal ads throughout the entire content? A scary thought that isn&#8217;t all that far-fetched.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div class="wlWriterSmartContent" id="scid:0767317B-992E-4b12-91E0-4F059A8CECA8:c4efa01a-7cde-483c-aac3-5684d4fb30f4" style="padding-right: 0px; display: inline; padding-left: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; margin: 0px; padding-top: 0px">Technorati tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tags/DRM" rel="tag">DRM</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tags/Microsoft" rel="tag">Microsoft</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tags/Fair%20Use" rel="tag">Fair Use</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://digitalmediaphile.com/index.php/2007/12/22/ms-to-force-us-to-view-ads-whether-we-want-to-or-not/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
