<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 5 Reasons Not to Trust C&#124;Net Reviews</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitalmediaphile.com/index.php/2007/02/19/top-5-reasons-not-to-trust-cnet-reviews/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitalmediaphile.com/index.php/2007/02/19/top-5-reasons-not-to-trust-cnet-reviews/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 10:02:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Mackay</title>
		<link>http://digitalmediaphile.com/index.php/2007/02/19/top-5-reasons-not-to-trust-cnet-reviews/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Mackay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 02:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalmediaphile.com/2007/02/19/Top+5+Reasons+Not+To+Trust+CNet+Reviews.aspx#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Hi all who are reading this blog!
 
I often find that the way a lot of people are going over Microsoft&#039;s offerings is as though &quot;Microsoft = McDonalds&quot;. This means they see Microsoft as the McDonalds of software, treading on &quot;protected&quot; interests. 
 
In my country (Australia) during the late &#039;90s, there was a &quot;huge stink&quot; about McDonalds setting up one of their family restaurants at the Royal Childrens Hospital in Melbourne. The big fear is that they could end up involved with &quot;in house catering&quot; for the hospital. We ended up with a requirement that they couldn&#039;t show the Golden Arches logo outside the hospital and I just found that the reaction really was so &quot;over the top&quot;
 
I often wonder who is behind the &quot;anti-Microsoft&quot; venom that has been going on all this time. Who is it who is courting the IT press to show hatred towards Mocrosoft?
 
With regards,
 
Simon Mackay</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi all who are reading this blog!</p>
<p>I often find that the way a lot of people are going over Microsoft&#8217;s offerings is as though &quot;Microsoft = McDonalds&quot;. This means they see Microsoft as the McDonalds of software, treading on &quot;protected&quot; interests. </p>
<p>In my country (Australia) during the late &#8217;90s, there was a &quot;huge stink&quot; about McDonalds setting up one of their family restaurants at the Royal Childrens Hospital in Melbourne. The big fear is that they could end up involved with &quot;in house catering&quot; for the hospital. We ended up with a requirement that they couldn&#8217;t show the Golden Arches logo outside the hospital and I just found that the reaction really was so &quot;over the top&quot;</p>
<p>I often wonder who is behind the &quot;anti-Microsoft&quot; venom that has been going on all this time. Who is it who is courting the IT press to show hatred towards Mocrosoft?</p>
<p>With regards,</p>
<p>Simon Mackay</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

